REF – maximising the value of digital content

The Research Excellence Framework (REF) reviews the quality of research within UK higher education. But how easy is it to submit digital content?

The most recent set of results, REF2021, has just been released. They happen every 7 years and a big part of their importance is that they feed into the allocation of research funding. The research outputs (that is, the discoveries and insights that come from the research in whatever form) are split into various categories, so we’ve been looking at the proportion of web content in REF submissions.

Itโ€™s great to see in the category splits that 44% of outputs of the type โ€˜digital artefactsโ€™, which includes web content, achieved the highest 4* quality level (world-leading), and a further 30% classed as 3* (internationally excellent).

But itโ€™s quite surprising to find in this digital age that the digital category is one of the least popular โ€“ 152,442 journal articles and 28,726 books (or parts of) were submitted, as opposed to only 542 in the digital artefacts category.

And whereas itโ€™s not always precise to compare to previous REFs because of changes in criteria, 2021 has even less digital artefacts submitted than in 2014 (542 as opposed to 761).

Quizzes, animations and chatbots can bring your research to life, particularly with a non-technical audience.

So why are there so few digital submissions to REF?

One explanation for this is the REF submission criteria. Itโ€™s important that every piece of research gets treated equally and fairly, so if a website gets the chance to be updated after publication whereas a research paper doesnโ€™t, itโ€™s got an unfair advantage.

So some website material would be put in the โ€˜physical outputโ€™ category by copying it onto a USB stick or DVD, for example โ€“ therefore some of the 400 physical artefacts in 2021 or 757 physical artefacts in 2014 may in fact be copies of websites.

The other way of submitting a website to REF is to create a completely separate copy of the site exactly as it was on the day it was published, and record the content on that date to prove that it hasnโ€™t been updated since.

Itโ€™s a shame that the advantages of a website โ€“ that it can be updated easily, and that the fresh and timely content can drive impact and engagement โ€“ are not being maximised when it comes to submitting them to REF. It will be interesting to see if ways to encourage digital submissions can be developed whilst keeping a level playing field.

It seems like digital material is being underused as a means of submitting to REF, and it could be a way of making your research stand out from the crowd.

Digital submissions to REF - image of a laptop with a colourful image
The vast majority of submissions to REF are academic papers, books and physical submissions

How to use digital content to drive research impact

Another explanation for the lack of digital content submissions is a concern that their impact might be a lot more subjective than that of a paper published in a high-profile journal.

However, when it comes to websites, itโ€™s possible to set up analytics that detail the website traffic and provide proof of the level of engagement. These can be drilled down to specific pages or even particular actions on the website (button clicks, link clicks, video plays and watch time, file downloads). โ€˜Heatmapsโ€™ can also be set up which visually track usersโ€™ interaction with a site, showing areas which get the most interaction โ€“ useful if you want to demonstrate the impact of an infographic.

AICE Project‘s Pathway Animation

In one paper, Project SCENe identified one of the benefits of their website was that one participant used it to talk to friends about the project. A website can also provide the possibility for interactions that are difficult or impossible with a research paper. Quizzes, animations and chatbots can bring your research to life, particularly with a non-technical audience. Once the tools available are properly set up to record and quantify user interactions, they need a lot less work than might be the case at a face-to-face event, particularly at scale.

Remember, the digital artefacts category doesnโ€™t just cover websites: animation, audio-visual presentations, and databases are all possibilities. If you want to present complex data and concepts to a general audience, they need to be presented in an engaging and inclusive way.


Ask us how we can help create digital submissions

We specialise in websites for academic research projects, so get in touch if you want to explore how to tap into the potential of digital impact.

Share 'REF – maximising the value of digital content'

More from the blog

Subscribe to our Maximum Impact newsletter

Want to make an impact too?

Leave us your details and we’ll be in touch to have a chat about how we can help.

Contact Form - small (bottom of most pages)